Thursday, May 26, 2011

Wannabe candidate's suit quashed

The Third District Court of Appeal has dismissed a lawsuit filed against the county for violating public notice rights on the District 7 race that one would-be candidate said makes it almost impossible for outsiders to enter the political arena.

The three-judge panel does not say why in it's two page ruling. But, from the questions they posed to the attorneys, it seems they thought the action by attorney Ricardo Corona, who says the county's decision not to qualify him violated his rights. It's a moot point now. But what's important to learn from this is that the county was able to strong arm its way to get its way. By delaying and taking it out of the lower circuit court that seemed more predisposed toward the plaintiff, they got what they wanted. They are gooooood. They likely knew that once the election had taken place, the courts would be very hesitant to interfere with how people voted -- as they should be. But what's important to remember here is that Corona's attorney's were ready on Monday to argue the merits of the case. Assistant County Attorney Eron Rosenthal said he was not. He wanted to depose Corona, he said. In court. I wonder if it was under oath. Because I am quite sure he never had the intention of deposing Corona. It was a stall tactic (just like trying to move it to federal court, which was immediately denied) so that he could come back to the appeal court after the election and in time for the canvassing certification and swearing in. Nice. I would expect that kind of strategy from a corporate attorney or someone representing Ladra's ex husband. The problem is that Rosenthal works for us. For Corona, too.

"What this shows is that the political process is corrupt," Corona said. "I still have faith in the legal process. Judge Thomas did the right thing. The judges at the Third DCA, I understand that they don't want to interfere with an election that has already taken place.

"This shows that we have a corrupt political system that perpetuates people who are professionally in office," Corona continued. "The people distrust that. The people had the recall because they don't like the system. They distrust the people running the system... who set the rules up so that the only ones that could qualify were the two insiders.

"They limited the choice of the people and I think that that's corrupt."

It's also short sighted, heavy-handed and murky, instead of transparent. Ladra is happy that we have the results, though admittedly less than happy with the results (why deny now?). But I'm concerned with how this happened and hope someone will make some clear delineations about the time stamps and the forms and investigate whether or not Corona's rights were violated.

Maybe this is a task for incoming Commissioner Xavier Suarez to take on.


  1. Ladra, you have previously stated that you are not an attorney, which comports with your erroneous belief that the County tried to stall the lawsuit or somehow devise a strategy that was unfair. And we all know Corona was represented by capable and well-respected trial attorneys who did not sit by and allow the County to somehow take them for a "ride." The Corona lawsuit was an example of the appellate process at one of its finest moments. Don't forget, it was Corona, whom you previously reported as wanting "the vote count out," and whom you previously reported as saying that it "was never his intention and he does not mind if there is an interim commissioner while his case is heard," it was Corona and his lawyers that opened the door to the County's appeal by not advising the Judge of their position on sequestering the votes. In other words, there was no delay. Anyway, it appears clear that even if this case had been decided by the trial judge in Corona's favor, the appellate court would not have upheld it because the law did not support Corona's position.

  2. Anon, are you suggesting that attorneys can't employ stalling tactics if opposing counsel is capable and well-respected? Now that's ignorant. If you are an attorney, please tell us your name so people will know who NOT to hire.

  3. I was not suggesting what you have concocted.


I have decided to moderate comments for a while as there are some that are simply off-subject and have become personal and offensive in nature, attacking not just me but others through this venue.

Comments that add substance and context to the news and issues in the blog will be posted. Comments that use profanity and abuse this open space to attack others will be saved and, when called for, sent to the appropriate authorities.